Abstract

The home bias like the disposition effect is a well-researched economic phenomenon in investor behaviour which has been examined in finance journal articles for decades. While there is little doubt about the existence of the bias, its magnitude varies across countries and investor groups. The home bias has to be regarded as a multifactorial phenomenon, a combination of numerous causes which all synergistically contribute. In contrast to other biases the home bias can at least partially be explained by reasons beyond irrational investor behaviour. While institutional restrictions play a minor role, informational asymmetries and superior information of domestic investors are important factors. Thus, the performance of investments may well benefit from a home bias, and the bias then no longer would be a puzzle but rather rational behaviour as a lower diversification level may lead to higher returns. The contemporary understanding of the home bias gains in relevance as the ongoing political debate in Germany has to clarify an institutional framework for long-run retirement savings plans of private households based on equity investments.

Highlights

  • In a frictionless perfect global capital market, investors should invest the risky part of their savings completely in the market portfolio to optimize their risk-return patterns and to comply with classical approaches as the CAPM (Sharpe 1964)

  • Empirical research provides evidence for decades that in real markets investors deviate from this portfolio structure which is optimal in perfect markets

  • The overwhelming majority of research examines home and local bias dealing with direct equity investments and indirect equity mutual fund investments, but the home bias can be determined for bonds (Ferreira and Miguel 2011; Solnik and Zuo 2016), real estate (Eichholtz et al 2001; Imazeki and Gallimore 2009) venture capital investments (Cumming and Dai 2010) and bank loans (Presbitero et al 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In a frictionless perfect global capital market, investors should invest the risky part of their savings completely in the market portfolio to optimize their risk-return patterns and to comply with classical approaches as the CAPM (Sharpe 1964). Empirical research provides evidence for decades that in real markets investors deviate from this portfolio structure which is optimal in perfect markets. Most empirical research tried to detect reasons why investors show a home and local bias. The necessity to privately save and invest for retirement purposes became more and more obvious to private households in countries like Germany with a long history of predominant savings only based on bank accounts and life insurances These changes in the overall institutional environment lead us to derive two research questions for the following literature survey: 1.

Literature selection
Defining home and local bias
Empirical evidence and measures for home and local bias
Empirical evidence and measures on the existence of home bias and local bias
Empirical measuring the varying degree of home bias and local bias
Reasons and causes of home bias and local bias
Institutional reasons
Transaction barriers and taxes
Correlation between markets
Internal governance of firms
Informational reasons
General informational asymmetries
Accounting and reporting standards as informational asymmetries
Information‐based familiarity and information asymmetry
Behavioural and individual investor‐specific reasons
Optimism and beliefs towards domestic assets
Competence hypothesis is based on three pillars
Uncertainty and hedging against uncertainty
Implications of home and local bias
The performance of biased portfolios
Further implications at the macroeconomic level
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call