Abstract

The initial surprise generated by the discovery of sequence-similar regulatory genes patterning the anterior/posterior axes of flies and mice has passed. Statements regarding the evolutionary implications of comparative developmental genetic data are now commonplace in the literature. However, despite the continued generation of developmental data, and citation of these data in reference to evolutionary issues, it is less than clear that there has been adequate integration of the developmental and evolutionary disciplines1. This is most evident in the language and examples chosen by developmental biologists when they turn to evolutionary themes. Here one finds frequent recourse to transcendentalism and typology. Thus, developmental workers seem to still hold Darwinism, with its unseemly aspects of natural selection, and the complexly branched evolutionary tree, at arm’s length. Here, we examine some uses of typology and transcendentalism that pass for evolutionary analyses and apply phylogenetic methods to developmental genetic data. In particular, we use character tracing in phylogeny and gene trees of conserved homeobox regulators to examine the homology of hearts and eyes and the “inversion of the dorsoventral axis”, topics of current interest in our rapidly increasing understanding of the evolution of metazoan development.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.