Abstract
The orbis totius has long served as an icon for the sphere of the knowable; the map, in turn, became early, and has in important ways remained, a dominant archetype of human knowledge. A field for the collation of diverse measurements, a framework for ordering nature, a means of nesting multiple scales of representation, an intersection of mathematics, astronomy, chronometry, precision instrumentation, and a host of craft practices, maps in the European tradition constitute a distinctive system for apprehending the lineaments of the natural world: like science itself, they are stable but flexible, structured but expandable. The study of cartography-as practice, theory, metaphor-has been the subject of a fair bit of recent work in the history of science (one thinks here of Lesley Cormack, Jane Camerini, and James Moore, among others). There is reason to look forward to more such studies in the future.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
