Abstract
With several thousands of years of tradition, Chongkukjang is one of Koreaโs most well-known fermented soybean foods. Chongkukjang has existed in Korea since the first century BC and throughout the Koryo dynasty and kingdom of Silla, while si (่ฑ, Chongkukjang) in Chaeksong was highly regarded according to the customs of Balhae. The fact that Koreans are good at creating fermented foods (ๅ่้) is recorded in Samkukjiwijidongijeon (Records of the Three Kingdoms, ไธๅๅฟ้ญๅฟๆฑๅคทๅณ), and Chongkukjang has been in Korea even longer than its 2000-year history in China. Chinese documents dating back to before 40 BC contain records of Chongkukjang or a similar fermented bean. Si does not originally come from China and was introduced to the country by an individual called Kang Baik (ๅบทไผฏ) who is thought to have hailed from Korea, and there were many names for Chongkukjang in pure Korean such as jyeonkuk, cheongkuk, chyeonkuk, and chyeongkuk.In short, Chongkukjang has existed as a fermented soybean food in Korea for more than 2000 years. However, some scholars have been distorting the truth and spreading false information about Chongkukjang. Some of these claims include โChongkukjang was first created during wartime, as it could be prepared quickly,โ โChongkukjang was introduced to Korea via the Qing dynasty,โ and โThe first documented record of Chongkukjang in Korea is in Junbosallimkyongje(ๅข่ฃๅฑฑๆ็ถๆฟ), written by Yu Jung-im (ๆณ้่จ) in 1760.โ If these claims were true, the Chongkukjang would be less than 400 years old. However, these theories are mostly put forward by scholars who are familiar with Chinese characters but know nothing about natural science or food science. By examining Korean history purely through the analysis of Chinese characters, which is indicative of the toadyish attitude of such scholars, they have committed the error of misrepresenting Korean food culture and history. Instead of looking at the history of Chongkukjang through the character si (่ฑ), they claim that the only references to Chongkukjang in ancient texts are words written in Chinese characters (็ ่ฑ้ฌ, ๆฐๅ้ฌ, ้ๅฑ้ฌ, ้้บด้ฌ, or ๆทธๅ้ฌ). How did this happen? Analysis of these documents can be used to demonstrate how these scholars came up with the baseless claim that Chinese characters, ็ ่ฑ้ฌ, ๆฐๅ้ฌ, ้ๅฑ้ฌ, ้้บด้ฌ, or ๆทธๅ้ฌ, refer to Chongkukjang, instead of the names that were actually used (jyeonkuk, cheongkuk, chyeonkuk, and chyeongkuk), and how they inadvertently relegated Chongkukjang to the position of a food that has only existed in Korea for less than 400 years. Before Korean script (Hankeul, ํ๊ธ) was developed, Chongkukjang was pronounced jyeonkuk, cheongkuk, chyeonkuk, or chyeongkuk and was referred to as si (่ฑ) in official records which were written in Chinese characters. After the advent of Korean script, Chongkukjang was recognized as a kind of jang alongside doenjang (soybean paste), kanjang (soy sauce), and kochujang (red pepper paste), which is why the character jang (้ฌ) was added as a suffix. Scholars then created the words ็ ่ฑ้ฌ, ๆฐๅ้ฌ, ้ๅฑ้ฌ, ้้บด้ฌ, and ๆทธๅ้ฌ by selecting Chinese characters that represent the pronunciation of jyeonkuk, cheongkuk, chyeonkuk, and chyeongkuk and adding the character jang to the end of each. This kind of mistake is understandable. However, these scholars have taken it further to the point that their interpretation, based on a false understanding of the way in which Chinese characters were used to spell out Korean words phonetically, has distorted the history and origins of Chongkukjang.
Highlights
Some scholars have been distorting the truth and spreading false information about Chongkukjang. Some of these claims include โChongkukjang was first created during war, as it could be prepared quickly,โ โChongkukjang was introduced to Korea via the Qing dynasty,โ and โThe first documented record of Chongkukjang in Korea is in Junbosallimkyongje (ๅข่ฃๅฑฑๆ็ถๆฟ), written by Yu Jung-im (ๆณ้่จ) in 1760.โ
A number of false claims about Chongkukjang have been made, mostly by scholars who are familiar with Chinese characters but know nothing about natural science or food science
By examining Korean history through the analysis of Chinese characters, which is indicative of the toadyish attitude of such scholars, they have committed the error of misrepresenting Korean food culture and history
Summary
Humans have no system for storing food within their bodies so that it can be eaten later. Even though there are clear differences between the origins and foods of Korea and China, some scholars seek to study the history of Korean culture and foods through documents written in Chinese characters, as there are very few such records written in Korean script.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.