Abstract

An exchange familiar to most historians of medicine recently took place at our school of medicine during a discussion about the inclusion of medical history in the curriculum. A committee consisting of academic medical historians and medical faculty active in the local physician-centre d history of medicine society had been established to help implement these changes. It quickly became apparent that committee members had different assumptions about what constitutes the history of medicine. For the physicians, history served two purposes, the creation of professional identity and didactic training. They believed that medical history should focus on examinations of disease discovery, diagnosis, and treatment from the perspective of medical practice and science, through examinations of the contributions and techniques of exemplary physicians. In contrast, the academic historians at the meeting viewed the history of medicine as a problem-based inquiry that should critically examine current and past medical claims. The academic historians were critical of the clinician emphasis on emblematic physicians, medical progress, and didactic history.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.