Abstract
The filling materials on the beauty market can be classified into three types: natural biological materials, synthetic polymer materials, and composites containing bioactive substances. However, comparative experimental data is lacking to compare their biological responses and permanence. The main object of this study was to evaluate the biological response of these three types of fillers to provide a theoretical basis for clinical application. Six-week-old female mice were injected subcutaneously with hyaluronic acid (HA) gel, calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) microspheres, and extracellular matrix (ECM) bio gel to observe the body reaction and permanence. At 1, 4, 8, and 16 weeks, the test sites were excised and analyzed by histopathology and proteomics. Extracellular matrix had a minimal foreign body response. HA had a good volume effect at the early stage but the volume retention rate was lower than CaHA in the long term. CaHA could stimulate neo-collagen formation. This study has proven the effectiveness and safety of these fillers and could provide clinical guidance for the plastic surgeon.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
