Abstract

A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) agonists have emerged as potent relievers of neuropathic pain by a T cell-mediated production of IL-10. The H4 histamine receptor (H4R), also implicated in pain modulation, is expressed on T cells playing a preeminent role in its activation and release of IL-10. To improve the therapeutic opportunities, this study aimed to verify the hypothesis of a possible cross-talk between A3AR and H4R in the resolution of neuropathic pain. In the mouse model of Chronic Constriction Injury (CCI), the acute intraperitoneal co-administration of the A3AR agonist IB-MECA (0.5 mg/kg) and the H4R agonist VUF 8430 (10 mg/kg), were additive in counteracting mechano-allodynia increasing IL-10 plasma levels. In H4R−/− mice, IB-MECA activity was reduced, lower pain relief and lower modulation of plasma IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 were shown. The complete anti-allodynia effect of IB-MECA in H4R−/− mice was restored after intravenous administration of CD4+ T cells obtained from naïve wild type mice. In conclusion, a role of the histaminergic system in the mechanism of A3AR-mediated neuropathic pain relief was suggested highlighting the driving force evoked by CD4+ T cells throughout IL-10 up-regulation.

Highlights

  • The prevalence of neuropathic pain in the general population is estimated to lie between 6.9% and 10% [1]

  • In this study we showed a cross-talk between the molecular mechanisms underlying the effect of adenosine A3 receptor (A3 AR) and H4 receptor (H4 R) agonists in reducing neuropathic pain induced in mice by the loose ligation of the sciatic nerve

  • We demonstrated that submaximal doses of the selective A3 AR agonist IB-MECA and the H4 R agonist VUF 8430 showed additive effects in decreasing hypersensitivity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The prevalence of neuropathic pain in the general population is estimated to lie between 6.9% and 10% [1]. Neuropathic pain refers to a broad range of clinical conditions that can be categorized anatomically (e.g., peripheral vs central) and etiologically (e.g., degenerative, traumatic, infectious, metabolic, and toxic) [2]. Current systemic and topical pharmacological treatments have substantial limitations in terms of the level of efficacy provided and/or the side effect profile. This means the management of neuropathic pain is unsatisfactory in preventing its development and progression [4]. This is why new pharmacological approaches are required

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call