Abstract

This note suggests that unless the Full Federal Court decision in FCT v Macoun [2014] FCAFC 92 is overturned by the High Court in the upcoming appeal, the literalist interpretation of domestic legislation enacting international obligations preferred by the Federal Court would set a dangerous and unwise precedent that is not only antithetical to the consistent and uniform development of international law in Australia but also to Australia’s effective participation in the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.