Abstract

Abstract Reviewing empirical evidence for major hypotheses in ecology is connected to two methodological challenges. First, all available empirical tests for a given hypothesis should be identified, collected and organized. This can be difficult due to divergent formulations of the hypothesis in the literature and divergent empirical approaches to address it. Second, the entire body of available data should be used to systematically assess the overall level of support of the hypothesis. Many approaches (e.g. formal meta-analyses) typically use only a fraction of the available data, often because of inconsistencies in the data. In this chapter, we show how the new hierarchy-of-hypotheses (HoH) approach can be used to overcome these challenges.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.