The Hidden Elements of Democracy Among Akyem Chieftaincy

Abstract

In Ghana as well as several parts of Africa, chiefs are probably the most recognizable local personalities because of the myriad religious, social, administrative, and judicial functions they perform. The knowledge that people, particularly nonnatives, have of chiefs comes largely from the ceremonial functions they see them perform in public. In the eyes of strangers, chiefs seem to enjoy a life of luxury and privilege. In reality, however, they have to artfully dance around several strictures that could potentially bring their lifetime careers crashing down. People expect their chiefs to diligently observe local traditions and uphold high moral standards in their personal lives. A chief who repudiates the trust his community has vested in him risks having destoolment charges brought against him. Destoolment is equivalent to presidential impeachment and conviction and is the ultimate humiliation a community could bring on a recalcitrant chief. This article examines some of the limitations that circumscribe the power of Akyem Abuakwa chiefs, which are designed to ensure that they remain humble and accountable. An ironic element in African political behavior is the institutional checks on the power of chiefs. Chiefs in their respective roles as traditional representatives of their towns or villages epitomize local government at its most practical and democratic form. As an integral part of local government administration in many countries, the institution of chieftaincy by far has been the best representation