Abstract

Treatment of the salt [N(PPh3)2]2[Ru4(CO)13]·thf (thf = tetrahydrofuran) with 2 equivalents of the complex [M(NCMe)4]PF6(M = Cu or Ag) at –30 °C, followed by the addition of 2 equivalents of PPh3, affords the mixed-metal cluster compounds [M2Ru4(µ-CO)3(CO)10(PPh3)2][M = Cu (1) or Ag (2)] in ca. 35–40% yield. The analogous gold-containing species, [Au2Ru4(µ-CO)3(CO)10(PPh3)2](3), was obtained in ca. 65% yield by treating a dichloromethane solution of [N(PPh3)2]2[Ru4(CO)13]·thf with a dichloromethane solution containing 2 equivalents of the complex [AuCl(PPh3)] at –30 °C, in the presence of TIPF6. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies on (1) and (2) show that both clusters exhibit similar capped trigonal-bipyramidal metal frameworks, consisting of a tetrahedron of ruthenium atoms with two Ru3 faces capped by M(PPh3)(M = Cu or Ag) units [Cu–Ru 2.608(2)–2.848(2), Ru–Ru 2.771(2)–2.981(2)Å for (1); Ag–Ru 2.806(1)–2.977(1), Ru–Ru 2.797(1)–3.074(1)Å for (2)]. Spectroscopic data suggest that the gold-containing cluster (3) also adopts a similar metal core structure. The skeletal geometries of clusters (1)–(3) are in marked contrast to the capped trigonal-bipyramidal skeletal geometries previously characterized in the solid state for the very closely related dihydrido clusters [M2Ru4H2(CO)12(PPh3)2](M = Cu, Ag, or Au), in which the Group 1B metals are in close contact. Thus, the formal replacement of two hydrido ligands in the latter clusters by the sterically more demanding CO group in (1)–(3) causes a fundamental change in the positions that the M(PPh3)(M = Cu, Ag, or Au) units adopt on the ruthenium tetrahedra of these species.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call