Abstract

Concerns are raising about the large variability in reported correlations between gray matter morphology and affective personality traits as ‘Harm Avoidance’ (HA). A recent review study (Mincic 2015) stipulated that this variability could come from methodological differences between studies. In order to achieve more robust results by standardizing the data processing procedure, as a first step, we repeatedly analyzed data from healthy females while changing the processing settings (voxel-based morphology (VBM) or region-of-interest (ROI) labeling, smoothing filter width, nuisance parameters included in the regression model, brain atlas and multiple comparisons correction method). The heterogeneity in the obtained results clearly illustrate the dependency of the study outcome to the opted analysis settings. Based on our results and the existing literature, we recommended the use of VBM over ROI labeling for whole brain analyses with a small or intermediate smoothing filter (5-8mm) and a model variable selection step included in the processing procedure. Additionally, it is recommended that ROI labeling should only be used in combination with a clear hypothesis and that authors are encouraged to report their results uncorrected for multiple comparisons as supplementary material to aid review studies.

Highlights

  • The personality trait ‘Harm Avoidance’ (HA) from Cloninger’s psychobiological model of personality describes one’s tendency to inhibit actions and behaviors in anticipation to expected risks and personal harm [1,2,3]

  • A recent review [7] revealed consistent reduced gray matter volumes (GMV) in the left medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) extending into the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) (Brodmann Area (BA) 32) and increased GMV in the left amygdala extending into the anterior parahippocampal gyrus in healthy individuals scoring high on negative emotionality traits

  • The analysis for M1 revealed a positive correlation between GMV and HA in the right precentral gyrus (Ke = 96, t = 5.41, pFWE = 0.048, pclus = 0.008) and a negative correlation in the right superior temporal pole (Ke = 101, t = 4.54, pclus = 0.007) and in an area that was not labeled in the AAL or Talairach atlases (Ke = 58, t = 4.56, pclus = 0.032)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The personality trait ‘Harm Avoidance’ (HA) from Cloninger’s psychobiological model of personality describes one’s tendency to inhibit actions and behaviors in anticipation to expected risks and personal harm [1,2,3]. Given the hypothesized link between personality and one’s vulnerability for psychopathologies, a growing number of researchers tried to associate individual differences in brain morphology to differences in negative emotionality related personality traits (e.g. HA) [7]. Such an association could be of interest since it would indicate the existence of a neuroanatomical basis for affective traits. This review showed a large heterogeneity in reported correlations

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call