Abstract
This article falls into two main parts. The first reviews the debate over the nature of rabbinic exegesis and its comparison with post-structuralist reading strategies, especially as this has been fuelled by the work of Susan Handelman. The second section focuses on the Masoretic text of the Book of Esther in the light of that review, setting Timothy Beal's recent work on Esther alongside some features of its reception in rabbinic literature. Some potentially common interpretive ground can be identified, but in what sense the indeterminacy of meaning maintained by such contemporary readings can be considered “rabbinic” remains, itself, an open question.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.