Abstract
Aim: To compare the hemostatic properties of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) and standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) ex vivo, as perioperative bleeding is still regarded as one of the major complications of transurethral prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Isolated normal saline (NS)-perfused porcine kidneys were used to determine the hemostatic efficacy of PKRP and TURP. The perfusion fluid loss was semiquantitatively measured in relation to tissue ablation for the two techniques and specimens were evaluated histologically. Results: The PKRP group had a significantly smaller loss of NS than the TURP group (4.16 ± 1.25 and 6.39 ± 1.05 g/min, respectively, p < 0.01). Compared with the measurements with TURP, the depths of the coagulation zones with PKRP were significantly larger (225.09 ± 35.77 and 146.84 ± 18.91 µm, respectively, p< 0.01). Conclusions: PKRP ex vivo was associated with significantly better hemostasis than TURP.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
