Abstract
Neoclassical trade theory is largely based on the Heckscher-Ohlin (H-O) theorem. This proposition has survived all criticisms for many decades and it is still the basis for orthodox free-market trade policies. The theorem has been tested by various methodologies under different scenarios. Still, the most cited test was conducted by Wassily Leontief for the US economy using its 1947 input-output table. However, his results contradicted the theorem’s predictions, which gave rise to the so-called, ‘Leontief paradox’. We test the H-O theorem as applied to the Mexican economy to find out whether the economic strategy with free trade has bolstered Mexico’s comparative advantages based on its relative factor endowments, as the theorem maintains. Our results clearly show that the H-O theorem does not apply to Mexico in the period following trade liberalization.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
