Abstract

Since the work of Semon was rediscovered by Schacter in 1978, there has been a renewed interest is searching for the “engram” as the locus of memory in the brain and Hebb’s cell assembly has been equated with Semon’s engram. There have been many theories of memory involving some concept of synaptic change, culminating in the “Hebb Synapse” theory in 1949. However, Hebb said that the idea that any two cells or systems of cells that are repeatedly active at the same time will tend to become “associated,” was not his idea, but an old one. In this manuscript we give an overview of some of the theories of the neural basis of learning and memory before Hebb and describe the synaptic theory of William McDougall, which appears to have been an idea ahead of its time; so far ahead of its time that it was completely ignored by his contemporaries. We conclude by examining some critiques of McDougall’s theory of inhibition and with a short discussion on the fate of neuroscientists whose ideas were neglected when first presented but were accepted as important many decades later.

Highlights

  • What is the neural basis of learning and memory? This question has concerned philosophers, physiologists, and psychologists since ancient times (Burnham, 1888, 1889a,b; Yates, 1966)

  • Many of these theories are discussed by Lashley (1934); Hilgard and Marquis (1940), and Morgan (1943), but we focus on the synaptic theory of William McDougall, which appears to have been an idea ahead of its time; so far ahead of its time that it was completely ignored

  • In The Organization of Behavior (1949), Hebb proposed that the neural basis of learning, memory and other psychological processes involved synaptic changes, cell assemblies and phase sequences, which connect the neurophysiological mechanisms studied by physiologists to thought and “mind” as studied by psychologists

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

What is the neural basis of learning and memory? This question has concerned philosophers, physiologists, and psychologists since ancient times (Burnham, 1888, 1889a,b; Yates, 1966). Following the development of the neuron theory and naming the synapse in the 1890’s there have been many theories concerning synaptic change, culminating in the “Hebb Synapse” theory (Hebb, 1949), but what were these theories? In this manuscript we give an overview of the pre-synaptic theories of the neural basis of learning and memory (before 1897), those of James (1890) and the post-synaptic theories (between 1897 and 1949)

The Hebb Synapse Before Hebb
Cell Theory
Neuron Theory Versus Reticular Theory
Sherrington and the Synapse
Localization of Function in the Brain
An Aside on the Early Names for Chemical Neurotransmitters
OTHER PHYSIOLOGICAL THEORIES OF LEARNING AND MEMORY
Neuroscientists Before Their Time
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.