Abstract

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) serve to correct proteins’ conformation, send the damaged proteins for degradation (quality control function). Heat shock factors (HSFs) are their transcription factors. The protein complexes mTOR1 and 2 (with the same core mTOR), the phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1), the seine/threonine-specific protein kinase (Akt), HSF1, plus their associated proteins form a network participating in protein synthesis, bio-energy generation, signaling for apoptosis with the help of HSPs. A cancer cell synthesizes proteins at fast rate and needs more HSPs to work on quality control. Shutting down this network would lead to cell death. Thus inhibitors of mTOR (mTORI) and inhibitors of HSPs (HSPI) could drive cancer cell to apoptosis—a “passive approach”. On the other hand, HSPs form complexes with polypeptides characteristic of the cancer cells; on excretion from the cell, they becomes antigens for the immunity cells, eventually leading to maturation of the cytotoxic T cells, forming the basic principle of preparing cancer-specific, person-specific vaccine. Recent finding shows that HSP70 can penetrate cancer cell and expel its analog to extracellular region, giving the hope to prepare a non-person-specific vaccine covering a variety of cancers. Activation of anti-cancer immunity is the “active approach”. On the other hand, mild hyperthermia, with increase of intracellular HSPs, has been found to activate the immunity response, and demonstrate anti-cancer effects. There are certain “mysteries” behind the mechanisms of the active and passive approaches. We analyze the mechanisms involved and provide explanations to some mysteries. We also suggest future research to improve our understanding of these two approaches, in which HSPs play many roles.

Highlights

  • Introduction to the Basic Function ofHeat Shock ProteinsNumerous proteins are synthesized in the cells to function as enzymes for various physiological functions

  • We aim to provide the basic mechanisms behind the plausible benefits of treating cancer patients with mainly HSP70-based vaccine, Heat shock proteins (HSPs) inhibitors and mTORC1,2 inhibitors, mild hyperthermia, and to highlight certain crucial questions to be answered in future experiments

  • The passive modality is to block out the growth of proteins by inhibiting mTOR1, 2 and/or inhibiting the abundant HSPs/heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) so that the cancer cells cannot survive

Read more

Summary

Introduction to the Basic Function of Heat Shock Proteins

Numerous proteins are synthesized in the cells to function as enzymes for various physiological functions. Many HSP complexes are found to be in close proximity of the cancer cells, and have been invoked to be participating in the carcinogenesis process in many studies They appear, together with some other proteins, as small lumps of molecules, outside, around a cancer, to be called the “exosomes”. We discuss the discovery that mild hyperthermia improves trafficking of APC and T cells through the narrow vessels around the cancer site with the help of adhesion molecules, and a detail account of the mechanism of the cross-presentation process. Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, and was responsible for 8.8 million deaths in 2015; about 1 in 6 deaths are caused by cancer [11]

The Large HSP110 Family and Grp170 Family
The HSP100 Family
The HSP90 Family
The HSP 70 Family
The HSP 60 Family
The HSP 40 Family
The Small HSP Family
Mild Hyperthermia as a Therapeutic Measure to Treat Cancers
HSPs Are Found in Cancer Cites
The mTORC1 Pathway
Influence of Mechanical Stimuli on the Protein Complex mTORC1
Activation of Helper T Cells by the Two mTOR Complexes
PERK-eIF2α-ATF4-CHOP Apoptotic Signaling Machinery
Passive Potential Drugs
Targeting HSP90 Alone
Targeting mTOR Cascade Alone
The Difference in Functions of Intracellular and Extra-Cellular HSPs
Two Distinctive Ways of Phagocytosis to Engulf Dead Cells
8.11. Examples of HSP-Based Vaccine and HSP-Related Anti-Cancer Drugs
Debatable Issue
Proposal of Further Research
Controversy
Findings
10. Concluding Remarks
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.