Abstract
This essay exposes a foundational misreading that occludes three puzzles in the Grendel episode: the anomaly of Beowulf’s hand-to-hand grip, the lack of counterattack, and the absence of heroic action in Grendel’s mutilation. I trace this misreading to Frederick Klaeber’s analysis of two analogue episodes from Grettir’s Saga. Within the saga I outline a shared plot structure that uses patterns of strategic interaction to confirm heroic agency. Conversely, I show how the Grendel episode subverts this masterplot, in favor of a sacred plot that confirms the agency of God. The shift is accomplished in a riddling design forged in Beowulf’s unwavering tenacity and Grendel’s unwavering attempt to flee. As this unvarying opposition replaces anticipated interaction, it charges Grendel’s hyperbolic reaction with enigma. The essential counter-clue comes, however, as demonic signs insinuate Grendel’s metaphysical antipathy to Beowulf’s inadvertent handfæstung (hand-fasting), an iconic gesture of covenant. Yet even as metaphysical tropes spotlight Grendel’s impotence, figures of equivalency extend to Beowulf, the Danes, and the Geats, eventually scuttling every confirmation of heroic agency. Accordingly, a farce of unintended outcomes ultimately subsumes the masterplot, as the tension between superhuman tenacity and superhuman desperation makes inevitable Grendel’s demonic self-destruction.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.