The health and economic outcomes of early egg introduction strategies.

Abstract

Studies suggest early egg introduction (EEI) in the first year of life is associated with reduced risk of developing egg allergy. No US recommendations exist regarding optimally implementing EEI. Using simulation and Markov modelling over a 20-year horizon, we explored optimal EEI strategies applied to US, European and Canadian populations, comparing screening of high-risk infants (skin prick testing [SPT] or serum-specific IgE[sIgE]) before introducing cooked egg at 6months of life vs egg introduction at home, without screening, for all infants. A no-screen approach dominated egg SPT screening of high-risk infants with early-onset eczema. Base model per-patient incremental costs of SPT were $6865 US dollars (USD), 6801 euros and $10610 Canadian dollars (CAD). For egg sIgE screening in primary care settings, base model incremental costs were $16722 USD, 18072 euros and $28193 CAD. As the simulation concluded 2.5% were egg allergic without screening vs 9.5%, 12% and 21.4% of children undergoing SPT, delayed introduction or sIgE screening. Incremental societal costs from screening reached $2009351175 USD for SPT and $4894445790 USD for sIgE testing. In sensitivity analyses, if the risk of reaction with initial egg ingestion was ≥22.5%, SPT before EEI became a preferred strategy. A no-screen approach dominated both EEI of raw pasteurized egg and delayed cooked egg introduction approaches. Assuming initial reaction rates<22.5%, a no-screening EEI cooked egg approach has superior health and economic benefits in terms of number of egg allergy cases prevented and total healthcare costs vs screening testing.