[The harvestion and application experience of free multi-lobed anterior thigh flap].

Abstract

Objective: To introduce the technique and clinical application of free lobed anteromedial thigh perforator pedicle flap. Methods: From September 2015 to September 2021, 72 patients with perforating buccal and oral cancer defects were treated at the Oncology Plastic Surgery Department of Hunan Cancer Hospital. There were 61 males and 11 females, with an average age of 36.7 years (31-56 years). According to Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM staging, there were 20 cases of T3N1M0, 13 cases of T3N2M0, 24 cases of T4N0M0, and 15 cases of T4N1M0. All defects were planned to be repaired with free lobed anteromedial perforator flaps. When there was only one set of vascular pedicle, the perforating vascular pedicle artery was anastomosed with the superior thyroid artery, and the accompanying vein was anastomosed with the superior thyroid vein by end-to-end. Results: The areas of soft tissue defects after radical resection of oral and buccal cancers in 72 patients were between 5.0 cm × 4.0 cm and 11.0 cm×7.0 cm; the areas of the first anterior femoral skin islands were between 5.0 cm × 4.0 cm and 13.0 cm×7.0 cm; the areas of the second anterior femoral skin islands were between 5.0 cm × 3.0 cm and 10.0 cm × 7.0 cm; and all flap donor sites were directly closed. In 35 cases, the vascular pedicle was accompanied by a lateral femoral muscle flap for filling the gap defect at the base of the mouth. The average length of the vascular pedicles of the flaps was 7.2 cm (range: 6.8-8.2 cm). The average diameter of the vascular pedicle arteries was 1.6 mm (range: 1.4-2.2 mm). The blood flow reconstruction of flap was completed by anastomosing one accompanying vein. The average diameter of the accompanying veins was 2.1 mm (range: 1.6-2.8 mm). Postoperative hematoma occurred in 3 patients, with one having vascular crisis. After emergency exploration, 2 of them were successfully saved, and the other one had complete necrosis of skin flap, which was repaired by pedicled pectoralis major skin flap transplantation. With following up of 12-38 months, the appearances of the flaps were satisfactory without significant swelling. The mouth opening and language function were satisfactory in all cases, and only linear scars were left in the donor sites, with no significant impact on thigh functions. Five patients with local recurrence of tumor were treated with second radical resection and repair with pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. Six patients developed cervical lymph node metastasis (4 on the same side and 2 on the opposite side) and underwent neck dissection again. Conclusion: The anatomical basis of the branches of the anteromedial femoral perforating branches in the anterolateral region of the thigh can be helpful to prepare the anterolateral femoral lobed flap, which is suitable for repairing the perforating defects after the radical operation of oral and buccal cancers.