Abstract

Assuming that Siegel zeros exist, we prove a hybrid version of the Chowla and Hardy–Littlewood prime tuples conjectures. Thus, for an infinite sequence of natural numbers x $x$ , and any distinct integers h 1 , ⋯ , h k , h 1 ′ , ⋯ , h ℓ ′ $h_1,\dots ,h_k,h^{\prime }_1,\dots ,h^{\prime }_\ell$ , we establish an asymptotic formula for ∑ n ⩽ x Λ ( n + h 1 ) ⋯ Λ ( n + h k ) λ ( n + h 1 ′ ) ⋯ λ ( n + h ℓ ′ ) \begin{equation*} \hspace*{13pt}\sum _{n\leqslant x}\Lambda (n+h_1)\cdots \Lambda (n+h_k)\lambda (n+h_{1}^{\prime })\cdots \lambda (n+h_{\ell }^{\prime })\hspace*{-13pt} \end{equation*} for any 0 ⩽ k ⩽ 2 $0\leqslant k\leqslant 2$ and ℓ ⩾ 0 $\ell \geqslant 0$ . Specializing to either ℓ = 0 $\ell =0$ or k = 0 $k=0$ , we deduce the previously known results on the Hardy–Littlewood (or twin primes) conjecture and the Chowla conjecture under the existence of Siegel zeros, due to Heath-Brown and Chinis, respectively. The range of validity of our asymptotic formula is wider than in these previous results.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.