Abstract
Rawson and Adams (2023) are certainly entitled to express their views about the lead and response articles by Sirrs etal. (2023a; 2023b). Their entitlement comes with a responsibility to accurately and comprehensively state their conflicts of interest (COI) so that readers can assess whether their arguments may be influenced by other interests.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
