Abstract

To test the hypothesis that rhizobacteria naturally present in soils may interfere with the extent of root colonization and plant growth promotion by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), we studied two lodgepole pine PGPR (Bacillus polymyxa strains L6 and Pw-2) when inoculated singly and when coinoculated with a non-PGPR competitor (Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens PF322). Bacillus polymyxa Pw-2 and Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens PF322 were consistently found as endophytes, while Bacillus polymyxa L6 was never found within the root interior. Strains Pw-2 and L6 differed in the rate and type of growth promotion. Strain Pw-2 increased root growth (branching and elongation) and shoot biomass accumulation 6 and 9 weeks, respectively, after inoculation, while strain L6 increased primary root elongation and root biomass accumulation after 12 weeks. Seedlings coinoculated with Pw-2 and PF322 had decreased shoot biomass and primary root lengths when compared with seedlings inoculated only with Pw-2. This effect was not linked to a decrease in the population size of Pw-2 in the rhizosphere or in the root interior of coinoculated treatments. In contrast, strain L6-mediated growth promotion was not impaired by coinoculation with PF322. Strain L6 did interfere to some degree with the growth-promoting capability of strain Pw-2. These results indicate that endophytic PGPR may be less adapted to microbial competition than external root-colonizing PGPR, and that the efficacy of endophytic PGPR may be reduced by the presence of other bacteria on external or internal root tissues.Key words: PGPR, endophytes, colonization, coinoculation, competition.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call