Abstract
It may be convenient in a theory of inflation to disregard the influence of the public sector or ‘to assume it away altogether because we have no theory of government expenditure’, as Domar has suggested originally in the context of the theory of economic growth [1] and because our theories of government income hardly go beyond the consequences of techniques used in taxation. But this probably is a more severe restriction for a theory of inflation than for the explanation of almost any other economic phenomenon. Regarding antiinflation policy this would also imply disregarding some of the most important policy instruments. On the contrary, I believe therefore that Schumpeter was right when insisting that fiscal policy and practice were of supreme importance for the development not just of national economies but also of human civilisation and of human behaviour, and that there were only very few exceptions to this rule [2]. Because the public sectors of most industrial economies have grown faster than their G.N.P. during the last decades, this may be even more true today than when Schumpeter wrote his article.KeywordsPublic SectorCentral BankFiscal PolicyPublic ExpenditureGovernment ExpenditureThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.