Abstract

The literature testing for aggregate impacts of taxes on long-run growth rates in the OECD has generally used tax rate measures constructed from macroeconomic aggregates such as tax revenues. These have a number of advantages but two major disadvantages: they are typically average, rather than marginal, rates, and are constructed from endogenous tax revenues. Theory predicts a number of responses to both and tax rates, but empirical analogues of the latter tend to be at the level. In addition though most OECD economies are best regarded as small open economies, previous macroeconomic tests of OECD tax-growth relationships have implicitly been based on closed-economy models, focusing on domestic tax rates. This paper explores the relevance of these two aspects – macro average versus micro marginal tax rates, and open economy dimensions – for test of tax-growth effects in OECD countries. We use annual panel data on a number of and tax rate measures and find: (i) statistically small and/or non-robust effects of macro-based tax rates on capital income and consumption but more evidence for labor income tax effects; (ii) statistically robust GDP growth effects of modest size from changes in income tax rates at both the personal and corporate levels; (iii) international tax competition, in which both domestic and foreign corporate tax rates play a role, is consistent with the data; (iv) tax effects on GDP growth appear to operate largely via impacts on factor productivity rather than factor accumulation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call