Abstract

This paper describes the recent strides towards marriage for gays and lesbians in the United States against the backdrop of the growing acceptance of realist philosophy and jurisprudence. Realist analysis now pervades American constitutional law as demonstrated by the adoption of the rational basis and strict scrutiny standards. Most significantly, constitutionality under Equal Protection is now determined under the reality-based equality principle which requires that persons who are similarly situated must be treated alike. To determine whether same-sex couples are similarly situated the courts have relied on expert testimony tested by cross examination as well as Brandeis briefs. The recent legislative enactments and judicial decisions recognizing same-sex marriage represent the triumph of reality-based analysis over traditional forms of legal reasoning.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call