Abstract

This article reconsiders the important work of Leroi-Gourhan through the lens of Christopher Johnson's ‘Leroi-Gourhan and the Limits of the Human’ (2011) by returning to the context of French prehistory of the 1860s that lies behind Leroi-Gourhan's discoveries and interpretations of hominid remains and artefacts in the Grotte du Renne. The Exposition universelle of 1867 and French publications of the period capture the importance of ‘préhistoire’ for Second Empire France materialized in Napoleon III's establishment at Saint-Germain-en-Laye of the first national Musée des Antiquités Nationales dedicated to their collections. The archaeological discoveries, and the debates they inspired, did not escape the encyclopaedic bricolage and designs of Flaubert. With delicious clins d'oeil to the question of ‘l'homme fossile’ and ‘l'homme futur’ that he had already debated with Louis Bouilhet, this article uncovers how Flaubert's Légende de Saint Julien details the ‘limits of the human’ in Johnson's reading of Leroi-Gourhan. By returning to ‘real’ counterparts for the legendary Stag in Flaubert's tale, its contextual, allegedly fantastical, ‘préhistoires’ can better be excavated. To find the non-legendary, extreme contemporary, sources for Flaubert's disturbing text crucially informs a critique of the dehistoricization of seeing in post-war French cultural studies and sciences of the human.

Highlights

  • According to the Petit Robert the dating and definition of the noun ‘Préhistoire’ in French in 18721 rests upon the first usage and etymology in 1865 of the adjective ‘préhistorique’:

  • Because characteristically convivial, long lunch in Nottingham in 2010 Chris and I delighted in how our very different work in French Studies derived from our shared concerns with knowledge of scientific mises en contexte

  • The controversy of Leroi-Gourhan’s work pivots on definition and dating in his argument for ‘l’homme de Cro-Magnon’ as early human not ‘pre-human’ and, in consequence, his extrapolation by means of the tool evidence of the co-presence – and prehistoric polygenesis – of differentiated early human cultures including anatomically modern humans.[6]. That this occurred over a longer time span than envisaged by rival theories of the inevitable and rapid eradication by the latter over the former was central to Leroi-Gourhan’s ‘Chronologie des Grottes d’Arcy-sur-Cure (Yonne)’ appearing in 1964 and published with Arlette Leroi-Gourhan

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to the Petit Robert the dating and definition of the noun ‘Préhistoire’ in French in 18721 rests upon the first usage and etymology in 1865 of the adjective ‘préhistorique’:.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call