Abstract
Abstract The green asset ratio (GAR) is supposed to be the central indicator for the taxonomy alignment of the bank’s assets. However, we show that GARs may differ for one and the same bank between article 8 taxonomy reporting and pillar 3 disclosures, leading effectively to two GARs. We argue that this inconsistency may lead to confusion and incredibility among stakeholders.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
