Abstract

Abstract The green asset ratio (GAR) is supposed to be the central indicator for the taxonomy alignment of the bank’s assets. However, we show that GARs may differ for one and the same bank between article 8 taxonomy reporting and pillar 3 disclosures, leading effectively to two GARs. We argue that this inconsistency may lead to confusion and incredibility among stakeholders.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call