Abstract

Many democratic societies have become more politically polarized, with the U.S. being the main example. The origins of this phenomenon are still not well-understood and subject to debate. To provide insight into some of the mechanisms underlying political polarization, we develop a mathematical framework and employ Bayesian Markov chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) and information-theoretic concepts to analyze empirical data on political polarization that has been collected by Pew Research Center from 1994 to 2017. Our framework can capture the evolution of polarization in the Democratic- and Republican-leaning segments of the U.S. public and allows us to identify its drivers. Our empirical and quantitative evidence suggests that political polarization in the U.S. is mainly driven by strong political/cultural initiatives in the Democratic party.

Highlights

  • Political polarization is on the rise in many democratic societies [1–6], and yet the causes of this relatively recent development are not well-understood

  • We study how the spreading of political and cultural ideas within populations that lean towards Democrats or Republicans can explain the evolution of political polarization, as observed in empirical data

  • To help quantify and characterize empirically-observed polarization trends, we develop a mathematical framework of political change based on (i) individuals’ diffusion from one ideological position to adjacent ones, and (ii) targeting of certain groups of individuals by influential actors who spread their ideas to coalesce around political/cultural positions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Political polarization is on the rise in many democratic societies [1–6], and yet the causes of this relatively recent development are not well-understood. This is pointed out directly in the abstract of [21]: “More empirical work is needed testing and underpinning micro-level assumptions about social influence as well as macro-level predictions.” Our work addresses this issue by proposing a parsimonious DeGroot-like model [26] of opinion formation and demonstrating that such a model is able to capture the evolution of empirically-observed opinion polarization in the US public with very few parameters. We find that a single parameter suffices to describe the evolution of polarization trends over the last 20–30 years and we identify this polarization measure [27] with the notion of initiative impact This measure enables us to quantify relative changes in ideology distributions between Democratic- and Republican-leaning segments of U.S society over time. Prominent examples of such initiatives are the Affordable Care Act, policy proposals involving higher tax rates on individuals with high income or wealth, tighter gun control, and samesex marriages, as we will discuss in more detail below

Definition of the ideology chain
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call