Abstract

Background: It is generally assumed that the false positive [FP] rate for EUS FNA is 0-1% and a positive interpretation is regarded as confirmation of malignancy. However, the FP rate for FNA obtained via other routes is reported to be 1-16% and even greater. We hypothesized that the FP and false suspicious [FS] rates for EUS FNA are greater than currently perceived and sought to determine the etiology of the false cytological interpretations.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.