Abstract

The pace of women’s access to leadership positions is very different from country to country. With 69.4 out of 100 points, Spain ranks fourth in the European Union (EU) on social power, first measured in the 2020 edition of the Gender Equality Index. However, a need of deepening the reasons for gender inequalities remains. The Women As Managers Scale (WAMS) is a useful tool that allows for the measurement of the attitudinal factors that hinder access to managerial positions. The aim of this study was to validate the Spanish version of the WAMS among sport managers through three factors: acceptance of women in key positions, features for business success, and barriers to access to managerial positions. For that purpose, a questionnaire—as is the original WAMS—was distributed to 401 managers working within sports organizations in the community of Madrid, Spain. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Student’s test were performed to analyze the stability of the scores. The internal consistency of the scales was assessed through Cronbach’s alpha, the Homogeneity Index, and Discriminability Index. The construct validity was completed through exploratory factor analysis using principal components. The results show that the WAMS serves as a reference for use as a measure of attitudinal factors that hinder access to an executive position. Therefore, this work generates an instrument with adequate properties in the Spanish context.

Highlights

  • Occupational segregation by gender still remains in the labor market, according to previous research [1,2]

  • The term is commonly defined as the invisible barriers that prevent women from progressing and gaining entry to higher management in corporations [4]

  • In order to complement previous work with the data in the sports sector, specific tools for explaining the gender differences in the sports sector are required. To fill this gap in the literature, this paper aims to validate the Women As Managers Scale (WAMS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Occupational segregation by gender still remains in the labor market, according to previous research [1,2]. The term ‘glass ceiling’ was first used in 1984 by Gay Bryant in an article in Adweek [3]. Later in March 1986, the term was coined and popularized in a special report by Carol Hymowitz and Timothy D. The term is commonly defined as the invisible barriers that prevent women from progressing and gaining entry to higher management in corporations [4]. This metaphor is commonly associated with the gender gap that symbolizes the difficulties that women experience in terms of representation at different enterprise levels [5]. It can be generalized to racial and ethical contexts (i.e., within minorities) [6]

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.