The German Rwabukombe Case

Abstract

Within the context of the Rwandan genocide, at least 400 people were brutally murdered on 11 April 1994 during the church massacre in Kiziguro, around 100 km north-east of Rwanda’s capital, Kigali. On 18 February 2014, after a three-year trial, the Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht — OLG) Frankfurt am Main, found Onesphore Rwabukombe, the former mayor of the northern Rwandan municipality of Muvumba on the Ugandan border, guilty of aiding the genocide on the basis of his participation in this massacre, noting in particular his lack of genocidal intent. Rwabukombe was sentenced to 14 years in prison. In the appeal proceedings (Revision), the German Federal Court (Bundesgerichtshof — BGH) criticized the lower court’s legal analysis and annulled the OLG’s decision with its Judgment of 21 May 2015. After a retrial, on 29 December 2015 the OLG Frankfurt am Main gave Rwabukombe a life sentence for his participation as a co-perpetrator acting with the required genocidal intent, noting his particularly serious guilt. This judgment is now final after the BGH dismissed a second appeal on 26 July 2016. This article provides a brief account of the factual circumstances of the case and the course of the procedure (1–3) and engages critically with the legal analysis of the BGH’s decision, especially focusing on the form of participation and the genocidal intent to destroy, based upon the OLG’s factual findings (4). In conclusion, the BGH provided convincing justification for its annulment in regard to the form of participation; however, the case shows once again that both the differentiated concept of participation and an overly voluntative understanding of the genocidal intent to destroy are stretched to their limits in international criminal cases of macro criminality.