Abstract
The thesis I wish to defend is this: the geometry which precisely and naturally fits the actual configurations of the visual field is a non-Euclidean, two-dimensional, elliptical geometry. In substance, this thesis was advanced by Thomas Reid in 1764, although, since this preceded non-Euclidean geometries by 65 to 90 years, no mention was made of them.2 The thesis conflicts now, as in Reid's time, with the view held by most psychologists and philosophers that the actual two-dimensional configurations of the visual field are Euclidean. It also appears to conflict with the recent theory of Luneburg [8] that the geometry of binocular space perception is, though non-Euclidean, hyperbolic rather than elliptical; but we shall see that this latter difference is merely apparent-Luneburg's theory deals with a different problem. To grasp the import of our thesis it is important to distinguish at the outset:
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.