Abstract

More than 12 % of women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime. Although there have been tremendous advances in elucidating genetic risk factors underlying both familial and sporadic breast cancer, much of the genetic contribution to breast cancer etiology remains unknown. The discovery of BRCA1 and BRCA2 over 20 years ago remains the seminal event in the field and has paved the way for the discovery of other high-penetrance susceptibility genes by linkage analysis. The advent of genome-wide association studies made possible the next wave of discoveries, in which over 80 low-penetrance and moderate-penetrance variants were identified. Although these studies were highly successful at discovering variants associated with both familial and sporadic breast cancer, the variants identified to date explain only 50 % of the heritability of breast cancer. In this review, we look back at the investigative strategies that have led to our current understanding of breast cancer genetics, consider the challenges of performing association studies in heterogeneous complex diseases such as breast cancer, and look ahead toward the types of study designs that may lead to the identification of the genetic variation accounting for the remaining missing heritability.

Highlights

  • Among women, breast cancer accounts for over 25 % of cancer diagnoses and 15 % of cancer-related deaths [1]

  • The second next-generation sequencing (NGS) study design is a staged study in which unrelated cases selected for a presumed high ā€œgenetic loadā€ for disease are sequenced in stage one, and only variants with evidence for association are genotyped in stage two in a much larger number of cases and controls

  • Linkage analysis and fine-mapping led to the discovery of BRCA1/2 and other high-penetrance and medium-penetrance genes, which are mutated in about a quarter of all familial breast cancer cases

Read more

Summary

Background

Breast cancer accounts for over 25 % of cancer diagnoses and 15 % of cancer-related deaths [1]. The second NGS study design is a staged study in which unrelated cases selected for a presumed high ā€œgenetic loadā€ for disease are sequenced in stage one, and only variants with evidence for association are genotyped in stage two in a much larger number of cases and controls This approach assumes that the genetic complexity in patients with high ā€œgenetic loadā€ is considerably reduced as compared with unselected patients because of the high-penetrance mutations. If mutations identified in a family are found in the general population, an extension of this family-based study design is to investigate their contribution to sporadic disease risk As noted for both the linkage and candidate gene examples discussed earlier, family history can modify the contribution to risk of even highly penetrant variants. Success in designing studies incorporating exposures, is predicated upon a substantive epidemiological understanding of the role of these environmental factors in disease susceptibility

Conclusion
Findings
54. Spurrell C
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call