Abstract
The use of site-directed nucleases (SDNs) in crop plants to alter market-oriented traits is expanding rapidly. At the same time, there is an on-going debate around the safety and regulation of crops altered with the site-directed nuclease 1 (SDN-1) technology. SDN-1 applications can be used to induce a variety of genetic alterations ranging from fairly ‘simple’ genetic alterations to complex changes in plant genomes using, for example, multiplexing approaches. The resulting plants can contain modified alleles and associated traits, which are either known or unknown in conventionally bred plants. The European Commission recently published a study on new genomic techniques suggesting an adaption of the current GMO legislation by emphasizing that targeted mutagenesis techniques can produce genomic alterations that can also be obtained by natural mutations or conventional breeding techniques. This review highlights the need for a case-specific risk assessment of crop plants derived from SDN-1 applications considering both the characteristics of the product and the process to ensure a high level of protection of human and animal health and the environment. The published literature on so-called market-oriented traits in crop plants altered with SDN-1 applications is analyzed here to determine the types of SDN-1 application in plants, and to reflect upon the complexity and the naturalness of such products. Furthermore, it demonstrates the potential of SDN-1 applications to induce complex alterations in plant genomes that are relevant to generic SDN-associated risks. In summary, it was found that nearly half of plants with so-called market-oriented traits contain complex genomic alterations induced by SDN-1 applications, which may also pose new types of risks. It further underscores the need for data on both the process and the end-product for a case-by-case risk assessment of plants derived from SDN-1 applications.
Highlights
Published: 22 October 2021Genome editing encompasses a suite of different techniques, which include, but are not limited to, site-directed nucleases (SDNs) and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis (ODM) [1]
Analyzed data of spontaneously occurring de novo mutations in A. thaliana and showed that mutation rates across the genome are associated with different cytogenetic features, including the GC content, DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin accessibility, gene expression, and the presence of the MMR system depending on the genomic region. These findings indicate that cytogenetic features differentially direct the DNA mismatch repair components to functionally-constrained genes most likely via binding of the histone modification H3K36me3 [37], which had already been discussed in previous studies [38,45,55,56]
The categorization of site-directed nuclease 1 (SDN-1) application types shows that three out of six studies induced ‘single gene knockouts’, whereas two studies fall into the category ‘multiple gene variants’ and one study into ‘multiplexing’ (Table 1)
Summary
Genome editing encompasses a suite of different techniques, which include, but are not limited to, site-directed nucleases (SDNs) and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis (ODM) [1]. The main focus in this paper is on SDNs, which include zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), meganucleases (MNs), or ‘clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats/CRISPR associated protein’. SDNs have increased the possibilities worldwide for researchers and breeders to alter the genome of target organisms in a way that is extremely difficult or impossible to achieve using conventional breeding techniques. CRISPR/Cas is a RNA-guided nuclease that has, over the last eight years, become one of the most frequently used SDN techniques in plants [12,13]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
