The general protected invasion theory: Sex biases in parental and alloparental care

Abstract

The biases towards eusociality, female workers and maternal care in haplodiploid versus diploid insects may result from the relatively low probabilities that rare mutant, partially dominant alleles promoting these behaviours will be lost by genetic drift in haplodiploid populations (Reeve, 1993). A generalization of this 'protected invasion' theory also predicts that parental and alloparental care will tend to be associated with the homogametic sex in diploid populations if the Y chromosome of the heterogametic sex is absent or largely inert. Sex differences in (allo)parental care (i.e. either parental or alloparental care) should increase with increased asymmetry between the sexes in the fraction of behaviour-influencing loci occurring on their characteristic sex chromosomes. The theory explains the strong predisposition towards female (allo)parental care in mammals, a contrasting tendency towards male (allo)parental care in birds, the propensity for joint male and female (allo)parental care in termites, and biases towards female cooperation in social spiders. The theory also explains the apparent rarity or absence of alloparental care in marsupials, an intriguing consequence of preferential paternal X-chromosome inactivation in this taxon. Thus protected invasion theory possibly provides new insights into the relationship between social structure and the genetic system. The theory does not compete with ecological or kin-selective hypotheses for the advantages of (allo)parental care; indeed, such advantages must exist for protected-invasion biases to operate.