Abstract
In their article, Ree and Earles summarized a vast research literature on the efficacy of g, or general intelli gence, in predicting job performance, both in training phases and in application of job knowledge and skills to actual job performance. In every case cited, g correlated from .33 in range-restricted samples to .76 in more general population samples of job applicants. Non-g aptitudes added little to the prediction from g. Critics of the connection between general intelligence and job performance voice their objections and counterpoints in an article and several comments that follow.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
