Abstract
BackgroundMany intriguing questions about predator-prey interactions can be addressed by using clay models of prey animals. These are placed in the field to test predators’ avoidances or preferences (testing e.g. color or shape) or to gain insights into predator identity. Modeling clay allows teeth, beak and jaw marks to remain on the model for identification. First used 30 years ago, clay models are now widely deployed. Ever since, the complexity of hypotheses, modeled species as well as the number of clay models used per study has increased. Although clay models are a valuable research tool, the method has limitations. Some questions cannot be addressed with these experiments, yet there is potential for improvement.Main bodyWe focus on the following aspects that need attention for clay model studies (CMS) in the future: (1) Use of proper clay materials, (2) how to standardize attack identification, (3) limitations of clay model studies, (4) use of clay models beyond predation experiments and (5) the next generation of clay model studies.ConclusionWe conclude that certain aspects of the clay model paradigm urgently need greater standardization. We advocate the use of harmless clay products and non-toxic inks, as well as having a neutral person to evaluate the marks left in the clay against pre-defined inclusion criteria. Further we suggest to use experimental data more cautiously in respect to evolutionary explanations, to use clay studies in detection experiments and to develop methods for attacker identification based on predator salivary DNA.
Highlights
Many intriguing questions about predator-prey interactions can be addressed by using clay models of prey animals
Further we suggest to use experimental data more cautiously in respect to evolutionary explanations, to use clay studies in detection experiments and to develop methods for attacker identification based on predator salivary DNA
Clay models are an effective research tool in ecological studies that have led to a considerable amount of knowledge on predator-prey interactions, predator species, effects of trait differences etc
Summary
Clay models are an effective research tool in ecological studies that have led to a considerable amount of knowledge on predator-prey interactions, predator species, effects of trait differences etc. More standardization is needed to use clay models as a successful tool especially with regard to the interpretation of attacks, unclear attacks and missing models. As alternatives are available that can be deployed in all environments and sufficiently fulfil material requirements, we strongly suggest to stop using PVC-based modeling clays in future clay model studies. We encourage the use of clay models in detection experiments as a valuable addition to assess to conspicuousness of prey. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Author details 1Department of Biogeography, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany. Author details 1Department of Biogeography, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany. 2Institute of Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
