Abstract

A hallmark of high-level visual cortex is its functional organization of neighboring areas that are selective for single categories, such as faces, bodies, and objects. However, visual scenes are typically composed of multiple categories. How does a category-selective cortex represent such complex stimuli? Previous studies have shown that the representation of multiple stimuli can be explained by a normalization mechanism. Here we propose that a normalization mechanism that operates in a cortical region composed of neighboring category-selective areas would generate a representation of multi-category stimuli that varies continuously across a category-selective cortex as a function of the magnitude of category selectivity for its components. By using fMRI, we can examine this correspondence between category selectivity and the representation of multi-category stimuli along a large, continuous region of cortex. To test these predictions, we used a linear model to fit the fMRI response of human participants (both sexes) to a multi-category stimulus (e.g., a whole person) based on the response to its component stimuli presented in isolation (e.g., a face or a body). Consistent with our predictions, the response of cortical areas in high-level visual cortex to multi-category stimuli varies in a continuous manner along a weighted mean line, as a function of the magnitude of its category selectivity. This was the case for both related (face + body) and unrelated (face+wardrobe) multi-category pairs. We conclude that the functional organization of neighboring category-selective areas may enable a dynamic and flexible representation of complex visual scenes that can be modulated by higher-level cognitive systems according to task demands.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT It is well established that the high-level visual cortex is composed of category-selective areas that reside in nearby locations. Here we predicted that this functional organization together with a normalization mechanism would generate a representation for multi-category stimuli that varies as a function of the category selectivity for its components. Consistent with this prediction, in an fMRI study we found that the representation of multi-category stimuli varies along high-level visual cortex, in a continuous manner, along a weighted mean line, in accordance with the category selectivity for a given area. These findings suggest that the functional organization of high-level visual cortex enables a flexible representation of complex scenes that can be modulated by high-level cognitive systems according to task demands.

Highlights

  • A fundamental feature of the high-level visual cortex of primates is its division into category-selective areas, such as face, body, or object-selective regions that reside in nearby locations

  • If the surrounding neurons are selective for the same category as the recorded neuron, the normalization pool is unresponsive to the nonpreferred stimulus and does not reduce the response of the recorded neuron to its preferred stimulus, yielding a maximum response

  • In the area of overlap between the fusiform face area (FFA) and the fusiform body area (FBA), which is selective for both faces and bodies, there was no significant difference between the contribution of the face and the body 1⁄2b ðFBÞ F

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A fundamental feature of the high-level visual cortex of primates is its division into category-selective areas, such as face, body, or object-selective regions that reside in nearby locations We thank Tom. Schonberg, Roy Mukamel, Jonathan Rosenblatt, Matan Mazor, and Nathaniel Daw for helpful input on this work; and Talia Brandman and Michal Bernstein for comments on this manuscript. To study the representation of multi-category stimuli, previous single-neuron and fMRI studies have examined the relative contributions of the isolated stimuli to the response of multi-category stimuli. These studies found different patterns of response in different areas of high-level visual cortex. Whereas the response in object-general areas, such as inferior temporal cortex in monkeys (Zoccolan et al, 2005) or lateral occipital cortex in

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call