Abstract

The interface of psychosocial and organic medicine is increasingly represented in primary care training programs. The intent of such programs is a comprehensive model for patient evaluation, yet current medical education may foster an artificial division in the diagnostic process. The initial interview of 60 depressed or hypertensive patients revealed a functional organic dichotomy in patient evaluations. Such a reductionistic approach neglected the role of psychosocial variables on the course of organic disease, drug compliance, or patient-physician attitudes. Alternatively, somatopsychic factors or concurrent physical disease amongst depressed patients may have gone undetected. Psychiatric patients were also scheduled for follow-up visits significantly less than their hypertensive counterparts. This may reflect resident physician attitudes toward the psychiatric patient.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call