Abstract

,NE OF THE MAJOR FACTORS in retarding the reputation of MelkJville's Moby-Dick was the unpopularity of the chapters that methodically describe the appearance and activity of the whale and tlie various processes involved in whaling. Both the reading public and the literary critics' found it difficult to accept what appeared to them an incongruous blend of formal exposition and traditional narration, a partial novel that could also serve as a handbook or treatise on whaling, a chaotic melange of adventure, metaphysics, and amateur scientific investigation. Today, however, with the increasing tendency to examine Melville's fiction as sui generis and rather outside the main stream of the English, or, for that matter, the American novel, it no longer orthodox even to consider Melville as an artless genius. Newton Arvin and Yvor Winters, who have strongly defended Melville's technical skill, account for the looseness and digressiveness of Moby-Dick by associating it with the form of the epic poem. Arvin states that There no doubt that [the form] in part the result of a conscious and artful process.2 Winters even more affirmative: Moby-Dick is beyond a cavil one of the most carefully and successfully constructed of all

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.