Abstract
Transplants of bone marrow into the anterior chamber of the eye were observed by Pfeiffer to produce migration, regression, and degeneration of myelogenous and hematopoietic cells at the same time that reticular cells proliferate and differentiate into bone. This key observation raised the question of whether the bone formation is the result of proliferation and osteogenetic activity of the reticular cells, or whether mesenchymal-type cells of the host are also induced by the transplant to differentiate into bone. From a comparison of bone marrow with epiphyseal cartilage, fracture callus, cancellous bone, muscle, and other tissues. Urist and McLean suggested that in the anterior chamber of the eye, one or another, or both, mechanisms are operative. Urist demonstrated that new bone formation occurs in postfetal life by the mechanism of induction alone in an implant of demineralized bone matrix in a muscle pouch. In recent years, the inductive agent and inductive response have been under intensive investigation with the aid of new and improved biochemic concepts and methods (Lindholm and Urist).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.