The frequency of self-reported memory failures is influenced by everyday context across the lifespan: Implications for neuropsychology research and clinical practice

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the influence of contextual factors on self-reports of cognitive abilities, this study investigated whether the frequency of self-reported memory failures was affected by level of daily busyness (Busyness) and daily routines (Routine) and whether age moderated these relations. The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-reported memory failures also was explored. Method: 902 community-dwelling participants (mean age= 56.98 years; sd= 18.96; range: 22–97 years) completed self-report questionnaires. Multiple linear regressions examined predictors of the frequency of retrospective (RM) and prospective memory (PM) failures and interactions with age. A pilot measure of the Influence of the Pandemic was added in secondary analyses. Results: Frequency of PM failures was significantly predicted by Age, Busyness, and Routine, such that people who were younger and those with busier and less routine activities reported more frequent PM failures. Frequency of RM failures was significantly predicted by Busyness, and the Age × Busyness and Age × Routine interactions. Busyness was associated with more frequent RM failures for people of all ages, but the effect was stronger for younger people. By contrast, more routine daily schedules were associated with fewer RM failures only for older people. PM/RM failures were predicted by the Influence of the Pandemic in exploratory analyses. Conclusions: Self-reports of cognitive abilities are influenced by contextual factors in adults of all ages. Contextual factors, including everyday task demands, daily routines, and acute stressors that disrupt daily activities, should be considered when interpreting self-reports of cognitive abilities in research and clinical practice settings.