Abstract

Users of natural family planning (NFP) practice periodic abstinence, leading many to reason that such couples should show increased anomalies in offspring as a result of fertilization involving aging gametes. In an effort to complement our NFP cohort study, we currently conducted a case-control study in the same region (South America) in which the largest number of cases have been recruited for our cohort NFP study. During 1992-94, 5324 case-control pairs of mothers were interviewed during the immediate postpartum period in 18 maternity hospitals participating in the Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations: ECLAMC (Spanish acronym for Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations). Natural family planning (NFP) usage was recorded in 6% of mothers in the ECLAMC sample studied (n = 10,648). Overall, no significant differences in frequency of NFP usage were observed between malformed cases (349/5324 = 6.6%) and normal controls (303/5324 = 5.7%) (chi 2 = 3.3; df = 1; p > 0.05). No significant differences in sex ratios were observed between children of NFP user and non-user mothers. Of special interest is the lack of association between NFP and Down syndrome, the sentinel phenotype for the hypothesis of delayed fertilization (aging gametes).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call