Abstract
Between 1982 and 1983, the Commission on Approval for Marketing Medications of the French government made 76 negative decisions based on problems with clinical trials. In 21 instances, the reasons for a temporary negative decision could be resolved from data already on hand or readily available. More serious problems resulted in requests for new studies having better controls, better management of ancillary therapy, more participants, or lasting longer. Indications that denial of the application is likely or outright refusals to grant approval were based on failure to demonstrate efficacy and concerns about toxicity. Analysis of the reasons for negative decisions can ameliorate the clinical trials submitted in support of an application for marketing approval. Improving the design and conduct of clinical trials based on correcting the defects discussed here would benefit the sciences of drug development, regulation, and patient care.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.