The French clinical guidelines and medical references programme: development of 48 guidelines for private practice over a period of 18 months.

Abstract

The French medical profession and health insurance organizations have jointly committed themselves to a concept termed the 'medical regulation' of care. They decided to promote the quality of health care, judging that an approach based on quality was the best option for reducing the increase in health costs. The Clinical Guidelines and Medical References programme was entrusted to ANDEM (Agence Nationale pour le Développement de L'Evaluation Médicale). Fifty working groups (669 experts) and 50 reading groups (1643 experts) met from June 1994 to November 1995 to produce guidelines. Learned societies were involved to propose experts. Hospital practitioners, doctors who specialized in the topic in question and those who did not had equal representation in the groups. The method consisted of a review of the literature to determine the level of scientific evidence. ANDEM's Scientific Council suggested modifications to the groups and agreed to disseminate 48 of the 50 texts. Careful observation of the operation of the groups identified factors that can positively influence the nature of the discussions and help avoid conflict: an abundance of high-quality literature, an understanding of clinical research methodology, the existence of guidelines from different institutions or different countries tending towards the same conclusions, good initial work carried out by the chairperson and the project manager, a limit to the number of questions asked of the group, the chairperson having good people skills and meeting-management skills, and an absence of professional and financial consequences for the participants. Good management of working groups is an additional factor in ensuring success. The regulatory medical references programme has led to changes of behaviour within the medical profession.