Abstract
The Fractionalization and Anthropocentric View of Comparative Psychology. Commentary: A Crisis in Comparative Psychology: Where Have All the Undergraduates Gone?
Highlights
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Comparative Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
The controversial nature of his opinion on the state of comparative psychology as a discipline lies in how one perceives the fractionalization of the field and the importance of connecting animal to human behavior
According to Abramson (2015) the division of the discipline into multiple sub areas, including but not limited to comparative cognition, ethology, biopsychology, and sociobiology, distracts from what was unique about comparative psychology
Summary
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Comparative Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology. A crisis in comparative psychology: where have all the undergraduates gone? The controversial nature of his opinion on the state of comparative psychology as a discipline lies in how one perceives the fractionalization of the field and the importance of connecting animal to human behavior.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
