Abstract

It is impossible to make any conceptual sense of the relationship between mental disability and any aspect of the law without an understanding of four critical factors that dominate—and control—this relationship. And this applies with even more power to the topic under consideration in this book: the sexuality rights of persons with mental disabilities. What is most vexing is that these factors often exercise this domination in an invisible manner (Perlin, 2000d). We have been writing about these factors— sanism, pretextuality, heuristics, and “ordinary common sense”—in different guises for over two decades (Perlin, 1992b, 1991b, 1990b) and continue to write about them in different contexts to this date (Perlin and Lynch, 2014, 2015b; Perlin, 2011b; Perlin and Dorfman, 2011; Cucolo and Perlin, 2012, 2013; Perlin and Weinstein, 2014).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.