The formalization of temporary urbanism in Toronto and proposed equity-based regulatory framework

Abraham Plunkett-Latimer

doi:10.32920/ryerson.14665581.v1

Abstract

In the past decade since the introduction of temporary urban discourse promising “faster, lighter, and cheaper” planning and a radical reorganization of power between regulators, land owners, and the public, temporary urbanism has become increasingly integrated in formal planning structures. This paper explores how temporary urbanism is being practiced in Toronto and what impact this formalizing process has had on its ability to achieve its claimed goals of democracy, equity, and diversity. This paper specifically assesses the impact that the City of Toronto’s regulatory framework has had on these goals. It concludes by examining how three other cities have created temporary use frameworks, Amsterdam, London, and Vancouver and highlights what lessons can be transferred to the context of Toronto. Key words: temporary urbanism, policy, equity

Highlights

In the past decade since the introduction of temporary urban discourse promising “faster, lighter, and cheaper” planning and a radical reorganization of power between regulators, land owners, and the public, temporary urbanism has become increasingly integrated in formal planning structures
SECTION 3: LITERATURE REVIEW Research on temporary urbanism has proliferated in the years since it was introduced as a key planning concept in the late 2000s
This study relies upon a secondary research approach drawing together a review of existing literature on temporary urbanism, examination of local case studies to establish the form of temporary urbanism in Toronto and international best practices, and it employs policy analysis to determine how existing policies may be positively, neutrally, or negatively affecting the implementation of temporary urban projects in Toronto

Summary

A Major Research Paper Presented to Ryerson University

I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this MRP. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this MRP to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public

The Theory of Urban Justice

Justice in the City of Toronto’s Policies

Why is Temporary Urbanism Relevant to the Concept of Urban Justice?

Temporary Urbanism as Tactical Urbanism

Temporary Urbanism as a Development Strategy

Temporary Urbanism as Exploitation

Contribution of this Study to the Planning Field

Context of Toronto

For-Profit Temporary Uses

Not-for-Profit Temporary Uses in Toronto

Analysis of Common Trends

Disconnection Between Departments and Districts and Overlapping Jurisdictions