Abstract

BackgroundPatellofemoral pain (PFP) is a prevalent, often recalcitrant and multifactorial knee pain condition. One method to optimize treatment outcome is to tailor treatments to the patientā€™s presenting characteristics. Foot orthoses and hip exercises are two such treatments for PFP with proven efficacy yet target different ends of the lower limb with different proposed mechanisms of effect. These treatments have not been compared head-to-head, so there is a dearth of evidence for which to use clinically. Only foot orthoses have been explored for identifying patient characteristics that might predict a beneficial effect with either of these two treatments. Preliminary evidence suggests patients will do well with foot orthoses if they have a midfoot width in weight bearing that is ā‰„ 11 mm more than in non-weight bearing, but this has yet to be verified in a study that includes a comparator treatment and an adequate sample size. This trial will determine if: (i) hip exercises are more efficacious than foot orthoses, and (ii) greater midfoot width mobility will be associated with success with foot orthoses, when compared to hip exercises.MethodsTwo hundred and twenty participants, aged 18ā€“40 years, with a clinical diagnosis of PFP will be randomly allocated with a 1:1 ratio to receive foot orthoses or progressive resisted hip exercises, and stratified into two subgroups based on their presenting midfoot width mobility (high mobility defined as ā‰„11 mm). The primary outcome will be a 7-point Likert scale for global rating of change. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis using regression models.DiscussionThis trial is designed to compare the efficacy of foot orthoses versus hip exercise, as well as to determine if high midfoot width mobility is associated with better outcomes with foot orthoses when compared to hip exercises. Results of this trial will assist clinicians in optimising the management of those with PFP by testing whether a simple measure of midfoot width mobility can help to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from foot orthoses.Trial registrationThis trial is registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ACTRN12614000260628)

Highlights

  • Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a prevalent, often recalcitrant and multifactorial knee pain condition

  • We propose undertaking a comparison between hip exercise and foot orthoses, as it will address a common point of contention regarding whether proximal or distal approaches to PFP are more beneficial [15]

  • A sample of 30 participants (15 per group) who have high midfoot width mobility provides 80% power using a two-sided significance level of 0.05 to detect a difference between the proportions of participants with improvement of 30% in the hip exercises group compared to 80% in the foot orthoses group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a prevalent, often recalcitrant and multifactorial knee pain condition. Foot orthoses and hip exercises are two such treatments for PFP with proven efficacy yet target different ends of the lower limb with different proposed mechanisms of effect. These treatments have not been compared head-to-head, so there is a dearth of evidence for which to use clinically. Preliminary evidence suggests patients will do well with foot orthoses if they have a midfoot width in weight bearing that is ā‰„ 11 mm more than in non-weight bearing, but this has yet to be verified in a study that includes a comparator treatment and an adequate sample size. Selecting a tailored treatment plan for an individual patient from this range of interventions will potentially enhance treatment outcomes and minimise exposing patients to non-essential treatments

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call